E1

Sunday, January 1, 2012

2012: The Year of Cold Fusion?

TECH
 
|
 
12/31/2011 @ 7:43PM |4,537 views

2012: The Year of Cold Fusion?

27
 
22
 
 
17
 
0
 
0
 

An example of simulated data modelled for the ... Well, there goes 2011, a year that was, to say the least, a mixed bag.
In the tech world it has been an interesting year. The Large Hadron Collider has, so far, failed to find evidence of the Higgs Boson (boo!) but at least it didn’t, as some people had feared, create a black hole that swallowed the earth (hooray!). Biological research produced promising results regarding antiviral drugs that may cure the common cold (hooray!) but a cure for cancer and HIV stills seems a long way away (boo!).
Curiously over 2011 Silicon Valley has shown a powerful resurgence of energy and dynamism (hooray!) and with that some of the wild optimism that characterized the 90′s tech bubble has reappeared (hummm). Apple became a commercial monster (hummm) despite the passing of Steve Jobs (boo!) and the IT world also had a generally positive year (hooray!).
I could go on and on with boos and hoorays for pages but there’s one topic I want to focus on: Rossi’s Energy Catalyzer or “E-Cat” system that is, despite everything we know so far, still in limbo somewhere between Boo! and Hooray!
If this topic is new to you, the really short summary is that the E-Cat is a Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) or “cold fusion” device that generates large amounts of heat for a miniscule cost.
I first wrote  about the E-Cat and its implications in my Backspin column in Network World  back in October  and then again a couple of weeks laterhere in my Forbes Technobable blog. Since then I have covered various aspects of the topic in a number of follow-up columns; should you wish to peruse any of these, here’s the list:
Why so many postings on this topic? Simple … as I pointed out at some length in the first columns, should Rossi’s E-Cat work as claimed, it will transform the world making oil, coal, and conventional nuclear power along with wind and solar power obsolete as energy sources.
Alas, despite a large amount of mainstream press coverage (most of it pretty uninformed and uninformative) and an incredible amount of blog coverage, the question of whether the E-Cat really works remains unproven because over the last year the E-Cat’s inventor, Andrea Rossi, has given a number of impressive but inconclusive demonstrations. These were inconclusive because they weren’t run in such a way as to remove doubt about what’s really going on and whether more energy was being generated by the E-Cat than was being put into it.
I should qualify that: When I write “inconclusive” I mean inconclusive to people who demand a realistic, scientific level of evidence … there’s a huge army of “believers” who contend (often in a fanatical and downright rude way) that Rossi’s system really does work. The central problem that makes the E-Cat so hard for people such as myself to believe in is that it would have to operate contrary to known physics.
The best explanation of why the E-Cat can’t work can be found in a terrific blog posting titled “The Physics of why the e-Cat’s Cold Fusion Claims Collapse ” by Ethan Siegel, a theoretical astrophysicist. Siegel’s analysis concludes:
… it’s time for the e-Cat’s proponents to provide the provable, testable, reproducible science that can answer these straightforward physics objections. Independent verification is the cornerstone of all scientific investigation and experiment, it’s how we weed out all sorts of errors from miscalibration to contamination, and how we protect ourselves from unscrupulous swindles. Given everything that we know … it’s time to set aside the mirage ofNickel  + Hydrogen fusion and get back to work finding real solutions to our energy and environmental problems.
Siegel is only one of many scientists who dispute the claim that the E-Cat can work yet despite such commentary it has been reported that Rossi has secured many orders for E-Cat systems to be delivered in 2012. On top of that a number of other companies have appeared offering similar products which, like Rossi’s E-Cat, have yet to be proven to work.
So, here we are, at the close of 2011 still waiting for Rossi or anyone to prove that the E-Cat or some other LENR/cold fusion device really works.
If the whole thing is a fraud it’s going to be one of the greatest in modern times. If it’s not, 2012 is going to be the year when everything changes.

Cold Fusion Machine passes another test

Italian cold fusion machine passes another test

Despite a world of skepticism about E-Cat and other devices, proof is adding up


COLD FUSION TIMES

COLD  FUSION  TIMES 
"The journal of the scientific aspects of loading isotopic fuels into materials and the science and engineering of lattice-assisted nuclear reactions"


http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html

Friday, December 30, 2011

The History of MIT’s Blatant Suppression of Cold Fusion

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

The History of MIT’s Blatant Suppression of Cold Fusion
Posted By: Steve [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 30-Dec-2011 08:21:11

A stunning report written by the late Eugene Mallove details the efforts of professors, researchers, and even the former President of MIT to squash cold fusion at all costs. If you have any doubt that Pons and Fleischmann had enemies desperately trying to discredit them, this article will erase it!
A funeral party or wake to mock cold fusion was held by biased hot fusion scientists at MIT before their experiment to replicate Pons and Fleischmann’s results was even complete!

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Water4Gas Technology

What is HHO Technology

Classic Mason Jar Electrolyzer
     Water4Gas educates people on one of the most PRACTICAL “free-energy” devices, marked by extraordinary simplicity and effectiveness. This technology dates back to the 19th century - as old as 1863 and probably much earlier!

      You cannot get anything, anywhere near this good, for several times the cost. The inventor is anonymous and this technology is Public Domain.
      The device you see in the photo is meant to be installed as a gas saving device and pollution reducer, along with other benefits, on vehicles or generators with all types of internal combustion engines. This includes gasoline and diesels, hybrids, flex-fuel (alcohol), bio-diesel and other types.
      This device, and core of Water4Gas technology (as you will see later), revolves around "splitting" water so it can be turned into energy. A totally balanced mixture of hydrogen fuel and oxygen is easily obtained by water electrolysis – which is why the device is called Electrolyzer. It burns perfectly because the exact amount of oxygen needed to burn hydrogen is already contained in the water! We get a perfect balance of hydrogen and oxygen without sweat, and the result is a pair of gases ready to burn beautifully – a perfect fuel.
      It is noteworthy, though, that in most cases today we use this “perfect fuel” as an ADDITIVE gas – as you will see we use it to supplement the gasoline (or any other standard liquid or gas fuel) and make it burn better.
      Electrolysis of water means using an electric current to dissociate the water molecules.Here's the cycle of action:
      Electrolysis: 2 H2O --> 2 H2 + O2 (2 molecules of water turn into 2 atoms of Hydrogen, plus one Oxygen pair)
      Combustion (the burning of the above gases): 2 H2 + O2 --> 2 H2O (the same in reverse - 2 atoms of Hydrogen and the Oxygen pair turn back to pure water, releasing some energy in the process!)
      The first recorded successes in decomposing water using electrolysis:

      In 1789, Dutch chemist Adriaan Paets van Troostwijk (1752–1837) and medical doctor Jan Rudolph Deiman (1743-1808) used an electrostatic machine and a Leyden jar for the first electrolysis of water.
      In 1800 it was done by renowned English chemist William Nicholson (1753-1815) and English surgeon Sir Anthony Carlisle (1768-1842).
      The device shown above is called Water4Gas Electrolyzer. Some call it "Hydrogen Generator" but it does not produce Hydrogen! It produces what we call "HHO" - it separates two water particles (molecules) into a different arrangement: 2 atoms of Hydrogen, plus one Oxygen pair, or in other words two “H” (Hydrogen) for each “O” (Oxygen).
      This combination, in its gaseous state, is called HHO. Also called Rhodes' Gas or Brown’s Gas after its famous researchers, William A Rhodes and Professor Yull Brown, respectively. HHO burns beautifully and provides TONS of energy. The device uses little electricity and very little water…
      Brown's Gas is a science all by its own and I do not pretend to be an expert on it. Some experimenters say that Brown's Gas is not HHO but a proprietary form of HHO. They say that Brown's gas has a certain stoichiometric (balanced or optimal in its ingredients) mix of hydrogen and oxygen atoms created by electrolyzing of water.
      We look forward to your participation in the adventure of learning about HHO technology. Be sure to sign up for access and download your free ebooks to get started!